Hoi, Jah, need peaks kustutama. Enne võiks teha muudatuse analüüsi - kui palju ja kus kustutataks, ega mõned linnad kohe väga tühjaks ei jää.
Jaak p.s. sama asi ka corine impordi osade tag-idega, näiteks põllud (field), need on pigem müra kui info kaardil. > On 14 Sep 2019, at 15:34, SviMik via Talk-ee <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi everyone! > > I'd like to discuss the import made by verbatium in 2008: > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/569055 > (...and other similar changesets) > > There are two issues with that import: > 1. Unknown data source with unknown license (probably it was a Garmin map > judging by the Type=0x13 tag) > 2. Poor quality of the data. If you see a building distorted like this: > http://svimik.com/verbatiumimport1.png > - you can be sure it's verbatium's. Maybe it was OK in 2008, but in 2019 we > have much better options. > > What can be done: > 1. Remove all buildings which geometry and tags were not edited since the > initial import. For the tags the following exceptions can be made because > they were automatic edits: > - User xybot has fixed the tag typo (buildung=yes) in the initial import and > added its own tag (created_by=xybot) > - User juhanjuku has removed the Type=0x13 and created_by=xybot tags > - User SviMik_import has imported the address tags to these buildings from > the Maa-amet database (nothing that can't be imported again) > 2. Proceed with the Maa-amet building import as usual > > It will solve: > 1. The license issue (if there is any) > 2. The quality issue (if you agree there is an issue) > 3. Will update the map in general, for example the demolished buildings will > be removed from OSM. > > For buildings which geometry was changed by other contributors after the > initial import - we can assume both license and quality issues were solved > since they no longer contain the imported geometry. I know it's a grey field, > and I'm not sure it works like that, but at least these buildings do have > some excuse to stay. > > For buildings which geometry was NOT changed, but some POI tags were added - > let them stay for now and discuss it later if needed. I suspect it will be a > rare case, but the exact number is unknown right now. > > Questions: > 1. Has anyone else digged into the issue, maybe asked verbatium himself? > 2. Can anyone confirm that the import indeed has the license problem? > 3. Is the proposed plan good? (in case if you agree that it needs to be fixed) > > -- > SviMik > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ee mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ee _______________________________________________ Talk-ee mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ee
