Buenas A ver sobre el mapa que adjuntas me choca bastante. Una cosa es bajar clasificación a las carreteras que van al lado de autovías y otra cosa es pasarlas a tertiary. Que tenemos en españa tertiary sin linea en medio y sin arcenes y vamos a igualar carreteras nacionales que en muchos casos tienen un arcen considerable y siguen en buen estado.
A parte me choca en Soria que la variante la pongas como tertiary. No la conozco esa parte pero vamos una variante de una ciudad, que parece que no tiene cruces a nivel me choca muchísimo como tertiary. ¿Puedes explicar claramente los criterios seguidos para dibujar el mapa? Un saludo. El vie., 11 may. 2018 a las 0:35, yo paseopor (<[email protected]>) escribió: > Buenas gente > > Al hilo de lo que dije en un anterior correo me gustaría informaros que > estos días en la lista de correo de tagging se está debatiendo sobre las > unclassified (un usuario planteaba que sus unclassified...tenían > referencia, lo que va en contra de la misma definición de "no > clasificada". Pues bien, al explicar la situación española en la que las > categorías de OSM no encajan exactamente en la clasificación administrativa > en algunos casos se han dado respuestas interesantes que para los que no > seais de la lista de tagging os hago llegar: > > Martin Koppenhoefer [email protected] via openstreetmap.org > > in Germany and Italy (and probably some more places) the difference is > between a road section without grade level intersections (and with ramps) > vs not. Trunk is used in these areas for roads that are built to a standard > similar to a motorway but not legally designated as motorway. It is not > about access restrictions (there is the orthogonal motorroad=yes property > for this). > > Kevin Kenny [email protected] via openstreetmap.org > > One issue is that we have the "UK English is the language of tagging" rule > - which widely gets interpreted as "highway classification must be > force-fit into the UK system." The US system presents a complex problem for > this, since most highway classification is delegated to the states, and > they all have their own local schemes. > > In many counties in the US, rural roads are unnamed and have only > reference numbers. A farm road may be "County Road 2200N" (which is a > different classification from, say, "County Highway 23", and typically > shown only on small blade signs, not banner signs) or "State Farm and > Market Road #2134". As I understand it, it would fit pretty closely with > what "unclassified" roads - which are a formal classification in the UK! - > are understood to be. > > Near where I live, numbered 'US', 'State' and many 'County' roads do NOT > reflect the governing body - they are all managed by the state department > of transportation. Historically, they had other structures, but > responsibilities were reallocated. The 'US' highway numbers are coordinated > with neighbouring states, but the administration is by the state. There > are also numbered but (nearly) unsigned 'reference routes' also maintained > by the state to 'State' highway standards. I say 'nearly' unsigned because > they do often have inconspicuous chaining markers with their numbers. > > Rather than labeling the governing body, the 'US', 'State' and 'County' > designations around here reflect the grade of importance, expected level of > traffic and expected quality of maintenance. Given that the designation > reflects relative importance rather than administrative jurisdiction, > despite the labeling, I'm comfortable with having US, State, and County > numbered roads be 'primary', 'secondary' and 'tertiary' - but in the places > where the counties number virtually every road, there is a need for a tier > below 'tertiary' - and 'unclassified' seems to be it; it's a working > category that might otherwise be 'quaternary.' > > Salut i mapes > yopaseopor > > PD: Me he mirado un poco el mapa de la "piel de toro" y he "pintado" como > quedaría el mapa de la Red de Carreteras del Estado si se aplicara la > propuesta que propuse. Y ya que estamos os sugiero que hagais lo propio, en > breve podríamos tener un inventario o un mapa del trazado y categoría > "real" que podrían tener las carreteras nacionales en nuestro país. Aquí os > lo adjunto. > > https://i.imgur.com/SicS3Gu.jpg > _______________________________________________ > Talk-es mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es > -- Jorge Sanz Sanfructuoso - Sanchi Blog http://jorgesanz.es/
_______________________________________________ Talk-es mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es
