On Dec 5, 2007 3:58 PM, Richard Fairhurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (cc:ed to talk-gb, probably better discussed there) > On a quick glance I haven't seen whether this is the case or not in > Exeter, but pre-0.5, Potlatch didn't display "unwayed segments" by > default. So you do sometimes get ways which were once unwayed segments > coexisting with Potlatch-drawn ways. Whether this was the fault of > Potlatch or of people leaving unwayed segments around is a moot point, > I think. ;) >
Probably guilty in my haste. :-) At least the unwayed segments thing isn't going to happen now. > > I've quite often mapped junctions without getting traces for every > constituent part - instead, just taken a few and noted the layout of > the junction on paper. When there's a lot of detail involved it's > usually best not to rely on GPS. > This is fair enough. I do this myself. I'm not sure why I got the feeling about these edits, perhaps unfairly I trust potlatch edits less than JOSM edits. > > FWIW after a very quick look at Exeter I can't immediately see > anything untoward. > Except the junctions floating in space? :-) Cheers Ben -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://crouchingbadger.com 51.717817,-1.225855
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
