On 29/04/2008 09:43, 80n wrote: > I'd follow the golden rule and tag what is on the ground. The fact that > some 50 year old map called it the B2032 doesn't help much if the LA > have decided not to bother maintaining signposts that also say this.
+1 > If its still a significant through route, but is consistently not signed > as a B road, then I'd probably mark it was tertiary in this case. > Possible with a note (or old_ref tag) referring to its historical B status. +1 David _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
