>Forgive me if I don't go around measuring the true height of each
>bridge.  (That's before we come to arched bridges.)
>
>Yes, the heights are advisory, but both are useful and I feel both
>should be tagged.  I don't believe I should be the one making the
>decision on how to deal with dual signage; I should be gathering the
>data that's there and leaving it up to the data users to work out what
>to do with it.

That sort of what I meant - you note down the height on the sign itself - in 
both units if present. And tag for both units - because you cannot make a 
simple conversion.

>I realise this started with how to tag in the UK, and is still on the
>talk-gb list, but the UK isn't the only place being mapped, and I'm open
>to other places having dual signage.  If these Wikipedia pages[1][2] are
>anything to go by, some places do, and both limits are rounded:
>
>    "Houston, Texas has some signs in both SI and imperial units near
>    its airports and downtown."

Well that's different. If there genuinely are two different signs - then you 
would have to tag both. The legal situation might also be technically 
slightly unclear.

>It would be even more wrong of me to attempt to convert, potentially
>losing accuracy.  I never said do that.

The whole point is that you *don't* lose any accuracy in converting from mph 
to km/h.

30mph is *exactly* equal to 48.28032 km/h. There's no approximation here, no 
rounding done - no loss of accuracy. It's an exact conversion - because the 
mile has been defined exactly in metric units (as well as most other 
imperial units).

Similarly 40mph is exactly equal to 64.37376 km/h
50mph is exactly equal to 80.4672 km/h
60mph is exactly equal to 96.56064 km/h
etc.

Where there is one sign only - it makes absolutely no difference whether you 
tag as maxspeed=30mph or maxspeed=48.28032. The values relate to the same 
speed.

I'm not saying you have to prefer one method over the other. That's up to 
you. 


_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Reply via email to