Peter Childs wrote: > In short if some local bike group have published them, then map them. > They are official to that bike User Group and perfectly good routes to > use (I guess) In short feel free to put in a relation for any > published route. So long as it either has signs and/or some documented > evidence (preferable available under a compatible license) Then map > it.
If they've been published, that's actually a very good reason *not* to map them, unless there are signposts on the ground. It's a clear violation of copyright without specific written permission. Furthermore, unless the group has based its maps on OSM in the first place, the chances are there will be a derived data problem -- who owns the original mapping the routes were plotted against? If there are signposts on the route, fair enough. If not, our only source of data is a copyright publication. -- Jonathan (Jonobennett) _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
