Hello Godfrey, Sorry I should have made another point:
"If it's a path which you know is a right of way via an Ordnance Survey map, but cannot verify that on the ground, again you must use foot=permissive even if that's not true. This is because you can't verify the right of way status from a non copyright source." To even tag such a path as foot=permissive you need some sort of evidence that it's being used by walkers (e.g. seeing other walkers on the path, "Keep to path" signs, local custom e.g. all paths in the New Forest have permissive public access). If you see a path where the *only* evidence that you can use it is an OS map, then you probably can't even use foot=permissive. In such cases you'll just have to tag as highway=path as the only thing you can verify from a non copyright source is the physical nature of the way. Perhaps foot=unknown or access=unknown too, or note=Might be private. Nick _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
