2009/9/18 Andy Allan <[email protected]>: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Richard Fairhurst <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Frankie Roberto wrote: >>> Have copied chippy and RichardF in, in the hope that they can help us >>> connect things up. >> >> Potlatch doesn't do WMS, it only does 900913 tiles (like OSM itself). >> You specify them in this format: >> >> http://tiles.mytileserver.org/directory/!/!/!.png >> >> where !, !, ! are z, x and y respectively. So, for example, you can have >> OSM Mapnik tiles by typing >> >> http://a.tile.openstreetmap.org/!/!/!.png >> >> None of the links on that warper.geothings.net page are in that format, > > 1) Grab the geotiffs > 2) gdalwarp > 3) mapnik generate_tiles.py > 4) stick them somewhere public > 5) http://www.flickr.com/photos/gravitystorm/3930896331/ > > Now it would be awesome if mapwarper could warp straight to 900913, > since that would save another warping. And I'm only using mapnik since > it's the hammer I have to hand for combining multiple rasters and > spitting out tiles. YMMV. > > Anyway, on the wider topic I believe individual warping is the best > approach, and it would be nice to rank images on their "verticalness" > so that I can stack them up with the most vertical ones visible on top > and the most oblique ones where there isn't any better alternative.
A random selection of vertical(ish) photos: 113-124 (all of one single area) 127 149 628,632,633,636,637,638 (all of the centre near the bridges) I agree a systematic approach to tagging all the photos would be better (anyone want to code up a tagging script?) but in the mean time these would be good ones to rectify. -- Matt Williams http://milliams.com _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
