Jerry Clough - OSM wrote: > I'm right there may also be errors on Arran, which also only had 2 10km > squares published. On the other hand, Arran may have been much better > surveyed in the 19th century because of its geological interest.
I have a "Crown Copyright 1972" 1:50000 geological map of Arran that claims to be: "Geologically surveyed by W. Gunn and A Geikie, B. N. Peach, District Geologist. Published in One Inch Sheets 21(1901) & 13(1902). Colour-printed Edition, 1910." (followed by republish and reprint info). _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
