Is using the source:OS_OpenData_{Product} tag good enough as a caveat? Or
should we also add FIXMEs? When I started I used both, but now as the tag
structures for the OS OpenData seems pretty solid I removed the FIXMEs and no
longer add them.
The one time I can think of using a FIXME in addition to the OS tags is for
roads which look like service roads in the OSSV data, but there's no indication
of their surface type. I add a FIXME if I don't know the surface type myself.
Or do we just assume that the OS tags are sufficient ad that people will know
that these should all be surveyed/checked on the ground?
Cheers
Tim
--- On Sun, 11/4/10, Dave F. <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Dave F. <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] OS StreetView accuracy: caution!
> To: "Tim François" <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Date: Sunday, 11 April, 2010, 2:39
> Tim François wrote:
> > I think OS *is* more accurate on the whole,
> I think you're probably correct, but the problem arises
> when we *assume* that it's more accurate in areas where
> we're not knowledgeable of what's on the ground.
>
> That's not to say we shouldn't map, but I think we should,
> as we've been doing before, tag in caveats using the fixme
> or notes tag to say we're uncertain of certain areas.
>
> Cheers
> Dave F.
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
