David Groom <revi...@...> writes: > Oh , if only it were that simple. > > Partly as I said in my earlier email, the CT's talk about data you have > added, not data which still exists. > > But more importantly your contributions would still remain in all the planet > dumps, so I presume you'd be relying on the "database people" to remove the > data from them as well. Probably a time consuming task, but potentially > do-able. But then there are all the copies of the planet dumps held on > other peoples computers. Should the "database people" ask for all of them > to be returned so they can be cleaned? > > You see data you add to OSM cant easily be removed. > > David > > -- > > Andrew > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Talk-GB mailing list > > talk...@... > > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > > > >
I still see no problem. There is essentially no difference post-relicensing between data derived from an unrelicensable source and mapping that is not relicensed because people cannot be contacted. Planet dumps from the CC-by-SA era are a non-issue because they remain wholly under the Creative Commons licence; post-relicensing history dumps omit both sets ofdata. -- Andrew _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
