But (unless I've missed something) that doesn't deal with the issue that the CTs reserve the right to switch the data to (amongst other things) a non-attribution licence at a future date.
Richard On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Peter Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > The OS have today switched to the Open Government License which means that > any remaining doubts of the compatibility of OS Open data with ODBL have > been resolved as far as I can see. > > Details in the email below. > > > Regards, > > > Peter > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Tom Hughes <[email protected]> > Date: 6 January 2011 10:29 > Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CTs and the 1 April deadline > To: "Licensing and other legal discussions." <[email protected]> > Cc: Richard Fairhurst <[email protected]> > > > On 04/01/11 15:49, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > >> As it happens OS is planning to move to the Open Government Licence, and >> this has an explicit compatibility clause with any ODC attribution >> licence. >> (It also has sane guidance on attribution, e.g. "If it is not practical to >> cite all sources and attributions in your product prominently, it is good >> practice to maintain a record or list of sources and attributions in >> another >> file. This should be easily accessible or retrievable.") > > This switch has just been announced: > > http://blog.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/2011/01/changes-to-the-os-opendata-licence/ > > Tom > > -- > Tom Hughes ([email protected]) > http://compton.nu/ > > _______________________________________________ > legal-talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
