On 23/03/2011 12:37, Dave F. wrote:
Most of the OPRA I know of lead onto paths/bridleways etc & are signed
as such at the beginning of the OPRAs.
If it's not obvious along the length of a path what its designation is,
or the designations in use are just silly*, then I'll usually tag a
source:designation. I guess that it would make sense to do this for
ORPAs where there isn't a sign on the ground.
If there isn't a sign, and there's no other source for access other than
"but it's obvious that you can walk/ride along it" that's not really a
designation, is it? I'd usually stick a note on explaining why e.g.
foot=permissive or foot=yes is correct.
Cheers,
Andy
* Like here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.80862&lon=-0.5763&zoom=15&layers=M
that goes "bridleway -> footpath -> bridleway -> restricted byway" from
SW to NE.
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
