Steve Doerr-2 wrote: > > On 09/04/2011 08:15, Peter Miller wrote: > >> maxspeed:type=GB:dual_carriageway (or GB:motorway, GB:rural, GB:urban) >
according to taginfo.openstreetmap.de there are 72 000 source:maxspeed and only 552 maxspeed:type. So at least according to the data source:maxspeed is what mappers have agreed upon. Yes, I don't really like the source:maxspeed either, as source has traditionally been the meta information of how data has been surveyed and not the on the ground / legal reason for a tag value. In the name of consistency, should one not stick to the "accepted method" though? Otherwise we might keep on going down the same path as with the "highway=footway" "highway=path" inconsistencies. Or perhaps we can do a mass bot-update of source:maxspeed to maxspeed:type? Kai -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Maxspeed-tagging-for-the-UK-tp6245995p6274975.html Sent from the Great Britain mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
