Peter Miller wrote: > It does however seem disappointing for them to be duplicating > some a lot of work. > > I agree that the OSM data is not perfect however it is good > and could be even better very easily.
AIUI they're not duplicating work. This is a "towpath condition" project, not a "map the towpath" project. BW already knows where its towpaths are. ;) I'm encouraging them to release under an OSM-compatible licence so that the towpath condition data they collect can be incorporated into OSM. cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/New-British-Waterways-map-why-not-use-OSM-tp6337909p6338341.html Sent from the Great Britain mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
