TimSC wrote: > Straw man. > [...] > Sigh. > [...] > It is ridiculous > [...] > I guess I should not surprised you can't see the benefits > [...] > This seems to be a common thread of your arguments - you make wild claims
Fair enough. It's fairly evident you don't see stuff on the same wavelength as I do. I could write a thousand points in response to that lot - asking how Mastermap's countryside coverage can possibly be "outstanding" without footpaths, and so on - and you'd respond with a thousand other points. We wouldn't really get anywhere. There's not really a lot of point going through fisking the whole lot, is there? It doesn't help the other n people reading this list. However, it _would_ be genuinely useful to other people, in my view, if you were to respond to my thread about "private negotiations" on legal-talk. Hopefully you'll either be able to do so or explain why not. Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/OpenKent-OSM-coverage-estimation-tp6434777p6454552.html Sent from the Great Britain mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
