Michael
Thank you for such a full explanation
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Collinson" <[email protected]>
To: "talk-gb" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 5:50 PM
Subject: [Talk-GB] OS OpenData and accepting the new contributor terms
[snipped]
regretfully decided not to use that but instead incorporate it into their
own unique license. The only provision that we can see that might be
contentious is this:
""The same attribution statements must be contained in any sub-licenses of
the Information that you grant, together with a requirement that any
further sub-license do the same."
As this is the only provision that the LWG can see might be contentious, can
I ask if the LWG specifically asked their legal advisors about that point,
and if so did they give any detailed reasoning why in their view it wasn't a
problem.
Regards
David
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
