On 04/07/11 18:36, Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote: > So presumably we also need > confirmation from Ordnance Survey that they're happy for their content > to be distributed under DbCL (or at least under the ODbL+DbCL > combination).
No, because they've agreed that licensing their data under ODbL is not a breach of their original licence. That means that once it is under ODbL it is simply a matter of whether DbCL is compatible with ODbL, which I'm assuming it is. I other words, once the data is licensed under ODbL, the OS OpenData license is irrelevant. -- Borbus. _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
