> From: bobhawk...@waitrose.com > To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org > Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 16:25:08 +0100 > Subject: [Talk-GB] How to use relations for The Chiltern Way and its > extensions > > > The Chiltern Way has a North Extension, a South > Extension and, new in 2010, a Berkshire Loop. Perhaps this is true of some > other long-distance paths. The Chiltern Way is shown at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_United_Kingdom_Long_Distance_Paths as > only 33% complete. As the South Extension and part of the > Berkshire Loop are within my area of interest in South Oxfordshire, I > should like to gradually add them as relations to the already-mapped ways in > order to increase that percentage. I should be interested to learn > other mappers' views: should the three extensions be part of one > existing Chiltern Way relation, or relations in their own right, or both? > If part of one existing Chiltern Way relation, how can the three extensions > be > identified separately?
I think each part should be a stand alone-relation, and then the whole way would be 'super-relation' which groups the smaller relations together. More detail about this is in the "Multiple routes share the same path" in http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route Be Seeing You - Rob. If at first you don't succeed, then skydiving isn't for you. _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
