On 20/08/11 11:11, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
This does raise a legal dilemma though. Should the path stay in OSM and risk the possible consequences - or should the path be deleted, risking potential OS copyright infringement (as it was the OS that confirmed that the path didn't in fact exist)?
Surely you just leave it there but change it to access=private or whatever...
As and when you find a legitimate way to map the real public footpath you can add that in separately.
Tom -- Tom Hughes ([email protected]) http://compton.nu/ _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
