A search shows up 2 proposals that might also be of interest, although they both seem a little insane to me.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/access_restrictions_1.5 (RFC start: 2011-04-26) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extended_conditions_for_access_tags (RFC start: 2009-07-09) The 1st proposal would translate your first example to something like: access:hgv.usage=yes; access:hgv.limited=yes And I'm sure I would cover the 2nd example but I can't figure out how! The 2nd doesn't seem insane enough to meet your first example, and for the 2nd would use something like: access:width>2 = destination If it isn't already clear, I provide these proposals for information purposes only and it should not be taken as an endorsement to populate the land with tags like "access:lgv!school_zone.time=Mo,We 08:00-18:00" Craig On 9 September 2011 09:13, Ed Loach <[email protected]> wrote: > Colin asked: > >> Is there any accepted tagging standard for the ubiquitous >> "Unsuitable >> for HGVs" (white text on blue background)? So it's not illegal for >> HGVs, >> just ill-advised. So it's a bit like "hgv=destination" in that you > don't >> want to be there unless there's no reasonable alternative, but it > is >> signed differently and probably not legally enforcable. I thought >> simply >> using "hgv=unsuitable" would fit nicely for this. Similarly >> "psv=unsuitable" if there is a sign "Unsuitable for > buses/coaches", >> or >> even "motor_vehicle=unsuitable" for "Unsuitable for motor >> vehicles". Any >> thoughts? > > My first post to the newbies email list in 2008 asked about the > "Unsuitable for motor vehicles" sign I had encountered and how to > tag it. I got no response. It seems that about 8 months later I > decided just to add motor_vehicle=unsuitable to the way in > question... > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/26551700/history > > Banoffee asked a similar question on the help website recently, and > they decided just to use note= > http://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/6287/unsuitable-for-vehicles > -text-sign > which is what I suggested when I started this wiki page > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Road_signs_in_the_United_Kingdom > two days before I added the motor_vehicle=unsuitable tag mentioned > above. > >> How about "width limit 6'6" except for access"? Applications like >> truck >> routing will need to distinguish these from the straight maxwidth >> roads. >> How about "maxwidth:throughtraffic=6'6" ? Or "maxwidth=6'6" + >> "maxwidth:destination=none"? > > This is a good question - I think I prefer the latter of your two > suggestions. If you have a photo of the sign it might be worth > adding to the examples section on the UK road signs wiki page, along > with whatever tags you settle on after discussion here. A Google > search ("except for access" site:openstreetmap.org) suggests that > "except for access" appears in a number of note fields and a few > description fields (plus the odd changeset comment). > > http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=except+for+access#values > suggests there is one occurrence of "maxweight=7.5 except for > access", but note is much more common currently. > > Ed > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
