On 28 November 2011 17:11, Richard Fairhurst <[email protected]> wrote:
> There are also a couple of towns where local cyclists have devised their own > networks and tagged them as 'lcn', even though there's little or no > on-the-ground evidence. In some cases the cyclists are in active discussions > with the transport authority to get this network adopted, but in others it > may be more wistful. We definitely shouldn't be doing this! Even for tagging "proposed" routes I've always assumed that it should be "proposed by someone with the authority to create it" - e.g. Sustrans' proposed national cycle network routes, or a local authorities proposal for a local network - i.e. not merely "proposed" by a campaign group. If there are routes in OSM that are neither signed nor likely to be created, then such wistful routes should be tagged, if at all, as something completely different. Cheers, Andy _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
