On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 4:08 PM, David Earl <[email protected]> wrote:
> What do other people think? If there's a strong view not to have these > parenthesised bits there, I'll take them out of the name tags. I think it would be best to have the information somewhere, in a consistent form (this probably means "always using the same tag"), but for it not to be in the name tag. I'm not sure what the tag should be, I don't think "operator" sounds right. Perhaps "affiliation"? (I know someone with good knowledge of CU formalities and terminology, and will ask him for suggestions.) __John _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
