Anyone know of a good example of National Trust property mapped in detail?


I'm preparing a presentation for the National Trust Scotland about 
OpenStreetMap.


Cheers,


Tim





> From: talk-gb-requ...@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Talk-GB Digest, Vol 64, Issue 41
> To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:00:04 +0000
> 
> Send Talk-GB mailing list submissions to
>       talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>       http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>       talk-gb-requ...@openstreetmap.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>       talk-gb-ow...@openstreetmap.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Talk-GB digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: Turner's Island, Hickling Broad, Norfolk (Barnett, Phillip)
>    2. DfT Consultation - Traffic orders: simplifying (&       mapping?)
>       the process (Ralph Smyth)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:41:45 +0000
> From: "Barnett, Phillip" <phillip.barn...@itn.co.uk>
> To: 'Andy Mabbett' <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk>,
>       "Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org"     <talk-gb@openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Turner's Island, Hickling Broad, Norfolk
> Message-ID: <662d22e018ca064a9f0aef3ac30520fa111...@mbx1.itn.LOCAL>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
> 
> This shows it nicely.
> http://www.panoramio.com/photo/11569018
> There's a narrow channel between it and Rush Hill, so it needs redrawing on 
> the map to make it an island.
> Phillip
> 
> 
> 
> PHILLIP BARNETT
> SERVER MANAGER
> 
> 200 GRAY'S INN ROAD
> LONDON
> WC1X 8XZ
> UNITED KINGDOM
> T +44 207 430 4474
> F
> E phillip.barn...@itn.co.uk
> WWW.ITN.CO.UK
> Please consider the environment. Do you really need to print this email?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Mabbett [mailto:a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk]
> Sent: 29 January 2012 23:12
> To: Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: [Talk-GB] Turner's Island, Hickling Broad, Norfolk
> 
> Does anyone know the location of Turner's Island, Hickling Broad,
> Norfolk, referred to in
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emma_Turner_(photographer)>?
> 
> Another source has it "in the south-east of Hickling Broad, next to
> Rush Hill, still known by local fishermen as Turner Island as late as
> the 1960s".
> 
> I'd like to add it to the map and include its coordinates in the
> Wikipedia article.
> 
> --
> Andy Mabbett
> @pigsonthewing
> http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
> Please Note:
> 
> Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
> represent those of Independent Television News Limited unless specifically 
> stated. This email and any files attached are confidential and intended 
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. 
> If you have received this email in error, please notify postmas...@itn.co.uk
> 
> Please note that to ensure regulatory compliance and for the protection of 
> our clients and business, we may monitor and read messages sent to and from 
> our systems. 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20120130/d5179576/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:14:04 -0000
> From: "Ralph Smyth" <ral...@cpre.org.uk>
> To: <talk-gb@openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: [Talk-GB] DfT Consultation - Traffic orders: simplifying (&
>       mapping?) the process
> Message-ID:
>       <dc8c4f388cdf294587584df0b436c898024da...@cpre-exchange.cpre.org.uk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> DfT has launched a new consultation today on amending requirements
> placed on traffic authorities in England when they propose and make
> temporary and permanent traffic orders (TOs):
> www.dft.gov.uk/consultations/dft-2012-06/
>  
> Traffic Orders cover things like (non-national) speed limits, parking
> restrictions, restricted turns/access etc. There are lots of potential
> advantages of digitising this data and making it available to third
> parties, whether reducing the need for signage clutter or the risk of
> drivers going round in circles looking for loading bays. I'm trying to
> highlight the link between this and the 'Satnav summit' being held by
> the DfT in March.
>  
> Quick summary:
>  
> '4.20 Instead [of using local newspapers], authorities would be under a
> general duty to publicise their orders in whatever they consider to be
> the most appropriate way. We propose to supplement this general duty
> with some non-statutory guidance setting out options available for
> publicising TOs, and identifying where each method would be appropriate.
> This would also encourage the use of innovative communication channels
> which already exist, and those which may evolve in the future. 
> 
> 4.21 We anticipate that traffic authorities will welcome the
> recommendation to use on-line publicity for their TOs. We would see this
> being used as a way of conveying the full details of the TO, which could
> be 'sign-posted' from other sources. With that in mind, we will propose
> a format for on-line advertising of TOs alongside the guidance with the
> intention of increasing the consistency of how TOs are advertised
> on-line.'
> 
> Having been a member of the DfT's Traffic Signs Policy Review, which led
> to this consultation, I'm meeting officials on Thursday morning (Feb
> 2nd) for a discussion and would be interested in any views how new
> guidance and a new format could best fit with open data principles. 
> 
> Peter Miller has already suggested use of principles from XML schemas:
> 
> http://interim.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/govtalk/schemasstandards/xmlschemas/
> developerguide/e-government_schema_guidelines_for_xml.aspx
> <blocked::http://interim.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/govtalk/schemasstandards/x
> mlschemas/developerguide/e-government_schema_guidelines_for_xml.aspx> 
> http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.cabinetoffice.gov
> .uk/govtalk/schemasstandards.aspx
> 
> I'm also interested how this could be made to work with new civil
> society tools, such as the Cyclescape project. So sorry for the short
> notice but any ideas on this list over the next few days would be most
> welcome. Otherwise you have until late April to respond to the
> consultation.
>  
> thanks
>  
> Ralph Smyth
> Senior Transport Campaigner, Barrister
> Campaign to Protect Rural England
> 128 Southwark Street, London SE1 0SW
> www.cpre.org.uk/what-we-do/transport
> <http://www.cpre.org.uk/what-we-do/transport> 
>  
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: winmail.dat
> Type: application/ms-tnef
> Size: 5756 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: 
> <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20120130/1be60eff/attachment-0001.bin>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
> 
> 
> End of Talk-GB Digest, Vol 64, Issue 41
> ***************************************
                                          
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Reply via email to