I reckon It's the inclusion of the A1(M) relation (103623) I've remove it from one of the carriageways and it seems to render properly now.
You just need to identify what it is about that relation that is overriding the tunnel tag.. Nick. On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Oliver O'Brien <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear all > > Does anyone know why the Hatfield Tunnel: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.76493&lon=-0.23691&zoom=16&layers=M > …is not rendering as a tunnel on the standard osm.xml Mapnik render? It's > osm_id 147479059 > > I've checked and it had the tunnel=yes tag. > > As far as I can see other tunnels are rendering correctly, such as: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.6895&lon=0.09384&zoom=16&layers=M > …on the M25 - osm_id 4479450 > > It doesn't seem to be a particular osm.xml rendering quirk or a caching > issue, as my own custom maps are similarly ignoring its tunnel status. > > Thanks > Ollie > > p.s. RIP Osmarender on the OSM front page. > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
