thanks for the fix. was logged into the IRC channel so was aware you were fixing it.
Various available links given for checking or viewing the relation are not working (at the moment). Is this a temporary problem, or is it linked to the size of the relation? Is this a type of relation that should be broken up and put into a super-relation? I think I'll stay clear of it until after the odbl cleaning thing has finished Cheers, Jason On 5 April 2012 16:16, SomeoneElse <[email protected]> wrote: > Right, (following a discussion on IRC) the SW coast path should be back to > as it was in rev 1746 now, apart from ways 30720938, 65128178, 2604800, > 30337452, 22976293, 4980897, and 98346377 which were deleted. Locals > familiar with the route might want to check what to check the gaps. > > Also, apologies to anyone who's edited it since it was deleted; I've not > merged those changes (that'll also need someone more familiar with the > route). > > Cheers, > Andy > > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk-gb<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb> >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
