It is a bit early though, they're normally late April/Early May.

I have seen a few this year though.

I guess the warm March and cold, wet April must confuse a fair few things, 
though it seems a good one for blossom. The colder weather seems to have put a 
brake on the over-advanced development seen during March, which is good if you 
don't want spring to end too early.

Nick

-----"Barnett, Phillip" <phillip.barn...@itn.co.uk> wrote: -----
To: 'Robert Norris' <rw_nor...@hotmail.com>, "talk-gb@openstreetmap.org"        
<talk-gb@openstreetmap.org>
From: "Barnett, Phillip" <phillip.barn...@itn.co.uk>
Date: 16/04/2012 12:27PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Hampshire Vandalization - No Bere Forest?

         Off -topic ---
 Apparently it's not been a good year for bluebells - wrong kind of spring.
 
 -----Original Message-----
 From: Robert Norris [mailto:rw_nor...@hotmail.com] 
 Sent: 13 April 2012 19:39
 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org 
 Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Hampshire Vandalization - No Bere Forest?
 
 
 
 ----------------------------------------
 > Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 03:27:31 +0100
 > From: openstreet...@jordan-maynard.org 
 > To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org 
 > Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Hampshire Vandalization - No Bere Forest?
 >
 > On 29/03/2012 19:30, Robert Norris wrote:
 > >
 > > I've just noticed Bere Forest (and trails) has been wiped from the map:
 > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.91178&lon=-1.15578&zoom=15 
 > >
 > > It's literally empty space!
 > >
 > > Probably most where Andy Steets initial trials, but he's agreed so 
 > > was there some over zealous deletion by some one?
 > >
 > > Unfortunately the history service contains to many world edits to be 
 > > of use, and the general OSM history is quit slow at the moment.
 > > I think user monxton has tried to repair stuff.
 >
 > If it helps, I don't mind if you revert my changesets to get back to a 
 > better place. I reinstated the roads, but clearly there's a lot more 
 > that went missing too.
 >
 
 This afternoon I went to the Forest of Bere in search of Bluebells as 
recommended by the Woodland Trust website [1]
 
 However it didn't live up to it's 5 star rating, but it was quite nice 
nevertheless - maybe I'm a bit late for Bluebells - there were some but not 
that many.
 
 So I've had a good wander and should be able to redo most main tracks (there's 
also loads of little paths - which where never in before anyway - not that I 
walked many of them).
 
 What's all nice is the Forestry Commission allow you to cycle on *all* paths, 
and horse riding is by permit only (tag as 'horse=permit' ?)
 
 I'll remap it time permitting tomorrow morning (out and about tonight) plus 
fixing the longer routes that go through it from previous outings / and renewed 
knowledge.
 
 I didn't go to the north parts of the Upperford Copse section though.
 
 [1]http://visitwoods.org.uk/en/visit-woods/Pages/get-involved.aspx
                                          
 _______________________________________________
 Talk-GB mailing list
 Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org 
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb 
      
     
     Please Note:

  Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Independent Television News Limited unless specifically 
stated. This email and any files attached are confidential and intended solely 
for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you 
have received this email in error, please notify postmas...@itn.co.uk

   Please note that to ensure regulatory compliance and for the protection of 
our clients and business, we may monitor and read messages sent to and from our 
systems.        _______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Reply via email to