On 20 June 2012 15:11, Richard Mann <richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.com> wrote: > The people who collected the data tell me that the cycle lane widths were > recorded in 3 categories: > 1) <1.5m > 2) 1.5>=x>2 > 3) >=2 > > So the values in the data (1.25 and 1.75 mostly) are spuriously accurate and > quite often overstated.
That's true, and that's why I arranged to have these widths in the "est_width" tag rather than the "width" tag. For the curious, here's the numbers across the database: est_width | count -----------+------- 0 | 6 1 | 9 1.25 | 9505 1.5 | 4 1.75 | 25209 2 | 18 2.5 | 27090 3 | 2 4 | 3 6.5 | 1 If there's any other questions regarding the data, feel free to ask! Cheers, Andy _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
