On 28 June 2012 13:14, Andy Allan <[email protected]> wrote: > If we could agree that railway=station nodes can be mapped in more > detail as station areas, and building=railway_station is kept for the > building(s) themselves (and otherwise untagged with ref etc), then > that would at least be a start. >
Makes sense to me. Presumably the "station area" would be something we'd have to guess from a survey and aerial photography, broadly encompassing the buildings and platforms? Is it then sufficient to include the station area/node and platform ways in a stop_area relation? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dstop_area It would then help if your fab transport layer rendered building=railway_station a bit more prominently, and rendered building=entrance nodes so people know where to enter large sprawling stations. Tom -- http://tom.acrewoods.net http://twitter.com/tom_chance
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
