> Searching OSM for name=Millennium Green shows that these are currently > mapped as: > > * parks > * village greens > * nature reserves > * recreation grounds > * common land > > To me it looks like leisure=park is best (with the others used only when the > exact same land area is also designated as one of the other types, all of > which seem to have some official meaning). However this does not cover the > Millennium Green status - perhaps designation=millennium_green? > > Alternatively we tag an area as leisure=millennium_green or > designation=millennium_green just round the designated area and leave the > park/common/whatever tag on a separate way (e.g. Millennium Greens may > comprise part of a larger open space).
Millennium Greens cover a wide range of on the ground usages. Same are clearly gardens, some parks, some nature reserves. Please do not retag these features to some perceived standard. I would also avoid overloading the designation key - better to have an explicit key than to reuse and existing key. About the only thing these area have in common is that they were all funded as part of the same project, if you want capture this information I would suggest something like: millennium_green=yes or how about: funding_source=Millennium Green -- Brian _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
