Some of the area's most certainly are not "protected" as they are actively being discussed for development. Also although it's called Green Belt it includes many areas that also have other designations, such as Country Parks, Golf Courses Recreation Grounds, etc etc etc.
I would prefer we get the underlying landuse mapped in first before we blindly import these areas as Green Belt. And as you say though, clarification on the licence would be needed before we did anything anyway. Cheers Andy From: Rob Nickerson [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 28 November 2012 18:23 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Telegraph releases Green Belt data As noted the resolution is not ideal, but the issue with gaps / overlaps between the areas is a rendering error on the telegraphs website only. The main issue however is the lack of clear licence. Perhaps try contacting the Department for Communities and Local Government and asking them. As for a tag try "designation=green belt". Perhaps you could also add a protected_area tag as per the following proposal: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Key:protected_area Regards, Rob _____ No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2013.0.2793 / Virus Database: 2629/5922 - Release Date: 11/27/12
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
