> -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) > [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 02 January 2013 11:23 > To: talk-gb > Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Guidance for adding PRoW to OSM: prow_ref= > > On 31 December 2012 16:38, David Groom <[email protected]> wrote: > > Not that I'm overly bothered, but since the wiki was only changed a > > few hours ago, and tag info statistics seem to show a greater usage of > > prow:ref, I'd have thought standardising on that (and changing the > > wiki) would have been the better option. > > Do you remember what figures were you looking at? > > The taginfo data I'm looking at today at > http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=prow_ref is dated as > "2013-01-02 00:58 UTC" and shows 670 uses of prow_ref, versus only 361 of > prow:ref. Have things changed that much in a couple of days? >
Sorry that's probably mainly down to me, but I never got round to emailing this list. After reading the email the other day pointing out that prow_ref is more in keeping with things like old_ref and int_ref and that prow:ref implied a prow namespace I was inclined to agree. As somebody that's put in quite a few prow:ref tags I went and changed them to prow_ref, but got interrupted before I could send a quick email to the list. Gregory _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
