That's how it appears on OS maps, e.g.
http://www.streetmap.co.uk/map.srf?X=286849&Y=54821&A=Y&Z=115
Steve
On 30/01/2013 10:46, Jason Woollacott wrote:
Hi Kevin,
Agreed, it looks wrong... The data came from the OS Boundary Line
data, which I took from the gpx trace from Colin's site,
http://csmale.dev.openstreetmap.org/os_boundaryline/
I wish I knew the reasoning behind it... I can understand the
boundary being at the low water mark, but it seems very odd just to
draw it across at Dittisham.
Jason
-----Original Message----- From: Kevin Peat
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 9:48 AM
To: Jason Woollacott
Cc: talk-gb
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Fowey estuary coastline problem
Hi Jason,
On 30 January 2013 08:00, Jason Woollacott <[email protected]> wrote:
This relates to some work I did on the Cornish county boundary a
while back,
the same also has happened at Newton Ferrers, just south of Plymouth.
I had been meaning to ask you about the boundary changes you made. Is
it right that the county boundaries now go some way up the rivers? In
the case of the River Dart all the way up to Dittisham. Just seems
counterintuitive (+ also looks crap).
Kevin (user:devonshire)
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
