On Sat, 2013-03-23 at 18:28 +0100, Colin Smale wrote: > I had already suggested boundary=planning to SemanticTourist. > Boundary=civil is rather ambiguous. In my eyes the boundary tag serves > to differentiate which hierarchy the area belongs to. For example > boundary=police might serve for police force jurisdictions, with > different values of admin_level for force areas and districts (not > sure exactly how they are organised). > > NP's don't have an admin function in the sense of a separate body to > administer them, they are just documents with a legal status which are > owned by (and binding on) certain bodies. There might also be Traffic > Plans, Landscaping Plans etc etc. > I spotted these whilst looking through local changes. To be honest it was the word 'Neighbourhood' that started alarm bells ringing. I have only heard Americans talk about the neighbourhood they grew up in or live in. But it appears to be true.
He has added a boundary for Ercall Magna, that follows the existing Telford and Wrekin/Shropshire boundary, but not quite. I am sure it should be the same, it does appear to break things. I do wonder what the point of this sort of information is? How does it make a better map? Phil (trigpoint) _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
