Thanks for that. Windermere is still problematic but I haven't done a lot of work with multipolygons so I'll let someone with more experience sort it out.
Nick -----Roger Calvert <[email protected]> wrote: ----- To: [email protected] From: Roger Calvert <[email protected]> Date: 24/03/2013 01:14PM Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Windermere and Rydal Water - missing The problem seemed to be that the boundary of Rydal Water had been split into 3 parts which, although they were assigned to the Rydal Water relation, had no tags of their own. Potlatch was not identifying the area as water. I have joined them up, and given them the natural=water tag. Potlatch now recognises Rydal Water as a lake. I chose this approach after reviewing how Grasmere was tagged. I assume something similar happened to Windermere, but have not time to investigate now. If anyone is not happy with what I have done, let me know - there are always subtleties of these things to be learnt. Roger On 24/03/2013 10:47, Nick Whitelegg wrote: Any reason why these seem to have disappeared or is it just an incorrect edit? If it's just a mistake I'll add Rydal Water back later, whether I have the time to do Windermere is another matter though unfortunately... Thanks, Nick _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb -- Roger Calvert _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
