On 29 Apr 2013 22:01, "Rovastar" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Great however the OSM referenced has been shoehorned in there (not > complaining though), as the cartographers mentioned finding the new 2000ft > "mountain" just seemed to use Ordinance Survey....notably the wrong height > appears on OSM and not updated. :( > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=54.81021&lon=-2.60709&zoom=16&layers=M >
What's with the feet, I thought 'ele' was supposed to be in metres? Kevin
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
