Copied to list too. An interesting idea, but I don't like the idea of namespacing roles: relations are complicated enough. At the moment the access tag should do this.
I'd like to keep the relation simple for now so am very much looking for a convenient catch-all name for the business to which the parking relates (actually "business" may do perfectly well!) On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 3:41 PM, John Sturdy <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 2:31 PM, sk53.osm <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> The only thing I'm not sure about is having the role of the owning entity >> blank. Any suggestions for a name for the role. Note that the relation >> between parking owning entity is not necessarily m:1, it could be 1:m >> (e.g., take-aways sharing a car park), or even m:n. >> > > How about making the role indicate what use the owning entity makes of the > parking, e.g. "customers" and "staff" (or perhaps "parking:customers" and > "parking:staff")? This could be useful when the owning entity owns several > distinct types of parking. >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
