Thanks for the replies... 

As the replies suggest that there is no
evidence at all of a special status for this area I will just remove it
from the New Forest District admin relation. If some evidence turns up
it's easy enough to add it, with a note of explanation! 

Colin 

On
2013-06-07 10:52, Colin Smale wrote: 

> Hi, 
> 
> Since February the
New Forest District admin boundary relation [1] has been sporting an
exclave in the form of Ironshill Lodge [2]. I couldn't find anything on
the internet about this, only about the various Inclosures in that area
but nothing to indicate that the Lodge area is outwith the control of
the local authority. I suspect the mapper's intention was to remove this
cleared area from the surrounding forested area and he/she used the
wrong relation. I mailed the user "Broken Star" a number of days ago but
haven't had a reply yet. 
> 
> My particular interest is in fixing the
hole in the admin boundary area. As far as I am concerned the
"offending" polygon can be removed from the NFDC relation and the
problem is fixed. 
> 
> Is there anyone in the area or otherwise in the
know who can confirm or deny that this is represented correctly in OSM?

> 
> Regards, Colin 
> 
> [1]
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/129306 [2] 
> 
> [2]
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/79436333 [3] 
> 
>
_______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
>
[email protected]
>
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb [1]




Links:
------
[1] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[2]
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/129306
[3]
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/79436333
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Reply via email to