Thanks for the replies...
As the replies suggest that there is no evidence at all of a special status for this area I will just remove it from the New Forest District admin relation. If some evidence turns up it's easy enough to add it, with a note of explanation! Colin On 2013-06-07 10:52, Colin Smale wrote: > Hi, > > Since February the New Forest District admin boundary relation [1] has been sporting an exclave in the form of Ironshill Lodge [2]. I couldn't find anything on the internet about this, only about the various Inclosures in that area but nothing to indicate that the Lodge area is outwith the control of the local authority. I suspect the mapper's intention was to remove this cleared area from the surrounding forested area and he/she used the wrong relation. I mailed the user "Broken Star" a number of days ago but haven't had a reply yet. > > My particular interest is in fixing the hole in the admin boundary area. As far as I am concerned the "offending" polygon can be removed from the NFDC relation and the problem is fixed. > > Is there anyone in the area or otherwise in the know who can confirm or deny that this is represented correctly in OSM? > > Regards, Colin > > [1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/129306 [2] > > [2] http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/79436333 [3] > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb [1] Links: ------ [1] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb [2] http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/129306 [3] http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/79436333
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

