Overview of missing Derbyshire footpaths: http://www.flickr.com/photos/sk53_osm/9390856924/
Jerry On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 5:33 PM, sk53.osm <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmm, I have sitting on my desktop a whole load of QGIS analyses of OSM > designation=* against the DCC rowmap TAB file, but as I'm on my way to SotM > Baltics wont write this up until I get back. > > I haven't looked in detail, but basic use of buffers seems to grab most > matching footpaths (buffer OSM data, and then use the buffered data to clip > the DCC PRoW data). Obviously crossing paths are also captured, but it > should be relatively easy to find only those footpaths where more than n% > of the route is within the buffered OSM path. > > So far I've used buffers of 10, 50 and 100m against the OSM data. > > I havent loaded the TAB file into PostGIS as there was some kind of > geometry problem. > > Jerry > > > > On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Phil Endecott < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Dudley Ibbett wrote: >> >>> I'm trying to make use of the row files on rowmaps for derbyshire and >>> staffordshire and and merging these with and osm map file to then produce >>> maps that can highlight which paths are and aren't mapped. >>> >> >> Thanks for doing this. >> >> One suggestion - it would be great if the disgnation=public_footpath/** >> bridleway >> tags on existing paths could be tidied up at the same time. Last time I >> looked, >> too few had these tags to be able to use them exclusively to identify >> footpaths, >> and the other tag combinations tend to have many false positives. >> >> >> Regards, Phil. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Talk-GB mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk-gb<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb> >> > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
