Will, Thanks. Same here.
Eric On 3 March 2014 18:42, Will Phillips <wp4...@gmail.com> wrote: > Eric, > > Try here: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=52.92611&mlon=-1.21314#map=18/52.92611/-1.21314 > > At this location, I can see the roof of a supermarket at zoom level 19. I > get a 'No tiles at this zoom level' message if I zoom in further. > Previously, I would see an area of waste ground before the supermarket was > built at zoom 20. And an even older view of the site at zoom level 21. > > Regards, > Will > > > On 03/03/2014 18:15, Eric Grosso wrote: > > Will, > > Could you please give an example of an area where the others, e.g. SK53, > can see the high-resolution imagery in order to see if it works for us. > > Thanks, > Eric > > > On 3 March 2014 16:35, Will Phillips <wp4...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> What I don't understand is why some people are seeing this problem but >> other aren't. I've just got someone who edits in another part of the >> country, and so will not be seeing cached images, to have a look at a >> location in my local area in JOSM. They could definitely see three >> different lots of high-res imagery at different zoom levels. Others, >> including SK53 and Blackadder, have indicated seeing the same. On the other >> hand, Eric's message below describes exactly what I am seeing, as did Steve >> Brook's message yesterday. >> >> Regards, >> Will >> >> >> On 03/03/2014 14:10, Eric Grosso wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I encountered exactly the same problem at the end of last week (before >> the higher zoom level images of my editing zone were still in cache and hid >> the problem) -- location: Edinburgh, Scotland. >> >> Apparently this problem appeared for some contributors at the beginning >> of last December: >> - (5 December) >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2013-December/010190.html >> - (7 December) >> https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/28868/aerial-background-imagery-disappears-in-p2-if-i-zoom-in-to-a-high-level-it-did-not-in-the-past >> - (18 December) http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=23592 >> >> Because the source of the problem is apparently due to some changes in >> the Bing maps API, the developers of the OSM editors, at least those of >> JOSM, did not much investigated this problem -- see comments 11 and 16 >> here: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/9408. >> >> @ Filip: an employee of Microsoft gave partially an answer here: >> http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/live/en-US/8e2af97a-f5e5-4ae0-acec-562db7e134d0/why-is-it-that-the-bing-map-control-has-a-much-lower-resolution-than-the-website?forum=bingmapswindows8 >> >> Some people think that there is a link with the launch of the new 3D >> Bing maps data: >> http://www.bing.com/blogs/site_blogs/b/search/archive/2013/12/05/maps3d.aspx >> >> I also checked on the Bing maps website. It appears that we can only >> access the zoom level 19 when using the Bing Aerial imagery ( >> http://www.bing.com/maps/) without showing labels. But if the labels are >> activated, it's possible to access all zoom levels even those higher than >> 19. So at the moment, because the Bing/OSM licence -- as far as I >> understand it -- doesn't allow the OSM contributors to use another Bing >> imagery than the Aerial one without the labels, the problem seems currently >> unsolvable. >> >> Cheers, >> Eric >> >> On 3 March 2014 10:00, SomeoneElse <li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk> wrote: >> >>> Andy Robinson wrote: >>> >>>> Zooming in on Nottingham I'm seeing three different imagery versions at >>>> different zoom levels. I don't anything missing. >>>> >>>> >>> Here's a specific example, to the north in Mansfield: >>> >>> >>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=potlatch2#map=19/53.14850/-1.18456 >>> >>> (using P2 because it doesn't overzoom) >>> >>> At z19 there's the current road layout. At z20 (or 21?) the old road >>> layout used to be visible (the footpath that you can see used to be a >>> road). I remember this one only because SK53 and I specifically discussed >>> the old road configuration, and I first mapped it (well, tidied up the >>> ex-NPE roads already there) when the roads were being changed to the new >>> configuration. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Andy >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Talk-GB mailing list >>> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-GB mailing >> listTalk-GB@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-GB mailing list >> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing > listTalk-GB@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb