On Thu, 19 Mar 2015, Pmailkeey . wrote:
> Still makes use of 2 fields but keeps the main field 'tidy'.
You can use whatever field name you want for non-standard usage, as
long as it doesn't interfere with prior art---but you will likely find
chosing something unique is not very useful.
(...As nearly demonstrated by the question that kicked this thread off
39 hours again about why a particular non-standard combination of tags
was not being found by existing search mechanisms).
-Paul
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
