On 25/04/15 19:38, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > Note: Nobody's forced to use the tag. I encourage people to make > positive proposals to move > tagging forward, not engage in the armchair sport of shouting down > proposals. Say > "here's another solution to consider" rather than "no".
Bryce ... you still have to make the case for 'special cases'. There is no reason to have two tags for many of these amenities. Trying to later tag a waterway=water_point that can also be used by land vehicles starts making things messy. Land point and water accessible points may have restrictions on their access, but there is no reason to duplicate tags and then add exceptions to those tags. Lets get a TAG that works across the board, and manage the access restrictions properly. Exactly the same applies to disposal points, recycling points and all of the other amenities which may or may not only be permited use by boats or other vehicles. waterway=water_point is the only such maenity listed on the waterway tag page, and it simply does not fit the rest of the waterway infrastructure. -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
