If the world is complicated it may be necessary to reflect that in the data
model (or alternatively make the data model so general that complications
are pushed to applications). I think the Royal Mail approach to addresses
is already too Procrustean!

However, there is a British Standard for addresses, which I'm told by those
who know it well provides a high degree of flexibility for the numerous
cases which do not reflect housenumber, supplement, street, place model.

Jerry

On 29 May 2015 at 15:26, Colin Smale <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
>
> If anyone is interested in the data model used by Royal Mail in UK
> addresses, this will tell you loads:
>
>
> http://www.poweredbypaf.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Latest-Programmers_guide_Edition-7-Version-6.pdf
>
> Warning: you may find yourself uttering things in "rather unparliamentary
> language" when you read this.
>
> Contrast this with the Dutch address model: Street, Housenumber (numeric),
> Housenumber Extension (alphanumeric), Postcode (9999XX) and Town. Probably
> much the same in Belgium and Germany too.
>
> //colin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Reply via email to