On 31/10/2015 22:27, Chris Hill wrote:
On 31/10/15 21:59, Colin Smale wrote:
The change could have been managed better, like proper announcements
a couple of months ahead of time, with a date - "On 30th October OSM
will switch to a new stylesheet for the standard map. For information
about what this will mean for you, click here" on some main web page
springs to mind.
I must have missed seeing your offer to manage the process. I suspect
the guys making the changes (in their spare time, who don't get paid
for this and certainly get very little praise for stepping up the
plate) would have really liked having a deadline set for the job
months ahead, with their paid jobs, their families and social life
getting in the way of meeting your deadline.
It appears it's my job to point out every few months that almost all of
us volunteer our time to OSM. Doing something for free doesn't
/necessarily/ automatically make it right. It certainly doesn't put it
above criticism. I fully understand about not being able to set a
deadline, but the actual amendments being implemented in this major
update could have been listed a bit clearer. The static image here:
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2015/10/30/openstreetmap-org-map-changing/ doesn't
make them obvious. Is there an explanation page I've missed?
I'm willing to let the new render bed in until I make my full opinion,
but atm I like the clearer road labelling. Unsure about tertiary being
rendered white, the same as unclassified although with a different width.
The width applied to the ways appears to have increased slightly at some
zoom settings. I think they're bit too wide if they're oneway single lanes.
There also appears to be inconsistencies with some woods rendering under
schools & residential areas, but that might be a delay in rendering some
tiles.
Dave F.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
