Hi Brian,
Brian Prangle schrieb:
Hi everyone
I've come up against a couple of problems and would like some guidance:
1.Nature reserves with one name that are made up of several other nature
reserves, often with their own name. How to represent these without a
mess of names rendering? Is there a relation to fit this situation?
you suppose, its to long for the map-layout?
An 'extra' relation just for denote? I don't think that.
see here:
<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area#some_examples>
(the first link is wrong ...). the second a relationbased mix of
different status an areas.
name:uk="one name that are made up of several other nature reserves"
and
name:"shorter name"
than you find in the search also the strings from the long (usually on
the map unseen) name
and on the map just the short name is shown.
( if you skipp even the short name, because its still perturbing, you
just see the border (with leisure=nature_reserve) )
2. Berwyns NNR in Wales. This is huge and there's no copyright-free
resource (unless I can use the schematic map on a noticeboard at a
stile). I can either put a node somewhere (where?) or add a guessed
polygon which folk can amend each time they visit the area (disadvantage
is it gives the air of authoritative extent when rendered)
yes.
I would map ("exact" ;) ) approximations - with a tag note="open for
harmonization" (or similar-sounding)
Regards
Brian
regards,
tshrub
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
