I've made that mistake in the past, it's not the most intuitive of layouts.


Jonathan


http://bigfatfrog67.me







From: Phillip Barnett
Sent: ‎Saturday‎, ‎12‎ ‎December‎ ‎2015 ‎09‎:‎55
To: Shaun McDonald
Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org






Sorry, my bad. I wasn't fully understanding the layout and was assuming the 
left hand column would disappear. Now I get it.


On 11 Dec 2015, at 22:17, Shaun McDonald <sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk> wrote:




Hi Philip,



Do you have a specific example where the not:names are not working? The left 
hand column on 
http://product.itoworld.com/product/data/osm_analysis/area?name=Cambridge has a 
list of the streets where the not name has been used, so that the Ordnance 
Survey can use that information as part of the feedback loop, and to allow 
later review.




I’ve looked at a few examples in the roads missing list, and for the road 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4076126 the comment on the last changeset 
suggests that there should be a not:name added to the street. I’ve not seen an 
example where there is a not:name which is not interpreted, and would be 
interested in any such examples.




The daily updates are from the OSM data, so within 1 or 2 days any changes that 
you make to OSM should show up in OSM Analysis. The updates to the OS data are 
done manually, which I’ve just done for the November 2015 data, and should be 
picked up in the next update. This will mean there will likely be a little jump 
in the numbers of unnamed roads. (Sorry for the delay in updating, I’ve been on 
paternity leave this past couple of weeks.)




Shaun

Developer

ITO World







On 11 Dec 2015, at 20:36, Phillip Barnett <phillip.p.barn...@gmail.com> wrote:





I'm slightly confused - I fixed a lot /most of Cambridge with not:name a year 
or two ago but on looking again, find the same errors still there. How do I get 
ITO to refresh this? The site says it was refreshed today.


On 11 Dec 2015, at 17:44, Jez Nicholson <jez.nichol...@gmail.com> wrote:





Thank you. You've prompted me to renew my quest for 100% in City of Brighton 
and Hove.... as long as the roads with/without apostrophes aren't counted in 
the percentage.



- Jez



On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 at 23:09 Steve Doerr <doerr.step...@gmail.com> wrote:



I think the URL may have changed. Try 
http://product.itoworld.com/product/data/osm_analysis/main

Steve




On 10/12/2015 22:34, Robert Neil wrote:




ITOWorld OSM / OS Locator missing street analysis has been off for a couple of 
weeks with page not found.

 

Anyone know what is happening with it?

 

Regards,

 

Robert 



_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb




  This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast. 
www.avast.com 
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Reply via email to