On 24 January 2016 at 16:14, Dave F <[email protected]> wrote: > Would it be possible to add the area location so we can check the ones where > we have more local knowledge?
I've added the postcodes from the official data to the second table on http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/schools/matching-queries.html . It's not easy to determine a location area for the unmatched schools in the first table -- essentially all I have is the coordinates of the OSM object. Hopefully the postcodes in the second table will be helpful. > If we let you know the why certain schools are flagging an error could you > update your list with an extra column to indicate the reason? It would save > users from double checking. Maybe. Though it's not clear exactly how best to implement it. Possibly the note would have to be tied to the OSM object number. I'll have a think about it. The highlighting (see below) may help people only check on things that have changed recently though, so it may not be that much of a problem. > On your OSM Keys page, what's the significance of the yellow/grey shading? On many of the tables in my tools, the grey backgrounds are the default, and the yellow highlights are to indicate rows where the OSM last edit is recent. (Currently 'recent' means within the last 10 days.) To complicate things further, in the table at http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/schools/osm-tag-keys.html rows that have an explanatory note never get highlighted. The idea there was to highlight recent unusual / unexpected key names for checking, hence wanting to exclude things that were understood. I'm not sure whether this is a good idea though, or just more confusing. Best wishes, Robert. -- Robert Whittaker _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
