I'd prefer that these are classed as schools as that's what they're called. Rgds Brian
On 17 February 2016 at 19:12, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) < [email protected]> wrote: > I've just done another update to the official data in my Schools tool > at http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/schools/ , with the small change that > I've excluded Edubase entries of type "LA Nursery School". Looking at > a few examples I concluded that these were likely to be for > pre-school-age children. My understanding is that these entities would > therefore be better tagged as amenity=kindergarten rather than > amenity=school. > > The result of this change in my tool is that there are now a number of > new entries at http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/schools/matching-queries.html > for these "Nursery Schools" -- where they have been tagged with a > correct Edubase URN, but now that Edubase entry has been excluded from > my tool. You'll probably also find a number of new red circles on the > progress maps where these "schools" in OSM no longer have anything to > be matched to from my Edubase import. > > Before anyone goes bulk changing these OSM objects to > amenity=kindergarten (which then won't be picked up by my tool when I > next update the OSM data -- as it currently only fetches > amenity=school and amenity=college objects) I thought it best to check > here whether my assumption about how these "LA Nursery Schools" should > be tagged is correct. If the consensus is otherwise, I'd be happy to > add the "LA Nursery School" category back into what I fetch from > Edubase. > > Best wishes, > > Robert. > > -- > Robert Whittaker > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
