I presume you mean the West Midlands: firstly Birmingham is there & secondly, I suspect East Midland mappers are less enthusiastic about this sort of thing.
Jerry On 11 March 2016 at 19:15, Edward Betts <[email protected]> wrote: > Chris Hill <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 11/03/16 18:03, Edward Betts wrote: > > >I've uploaded my first changeset - Places of worship in Birmingham. > > > > > >https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37766888 > > > > > >This is a modification to 10 ways and one relation. > > > > > >The relation is a multipolygon representing Birmingham Oratory. The > uploader > > >has put the wikidata tag on the relation, which looks wrong. The other > tags for > > >the church are on the outer way. I will fix this before I do any more > uploads. > > > > > > > Since more than one person has asked you to check with local mappers > before > > making these uploads and there is an unanswered question about the > licence, > > I would ask you to stop uploading any more of these data until these > > questions have been addressed to the satisfaction of the mappers in GB. > > I was specially approached by mappers from the East Midlands and asked to > upload this data. Sorry for not making this clear. > > There is no problem with the license. I'm not deriving anything from > Wikipedia > or Wikidata. I'm just adding a link to Wikidata. There are already lots of > links to both Wikipedia and Wikidata in OSM. > -- > Edward. > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
