On 20/09/16 at 11:28am, Donald wrote:
> If a building or road is removed, and nothing has replaced it, then i
> think it is good to have some sort of lifestyle prefix like
> demolished:building or removed:road, especially as they are usually still
> visible from aerial images.
> I have also used highway=no not:name= for the ITO analysis.
> Once the new development goes in these can and should probably be deleted.
Worth adding the main advantage of this, is if an armchair mapper comes
along tracing, then it *should* be obvious to them that those items no
longer exist and have been deliberatly removed.
Talk-GB mailing list